Bumper Guardian

January 29, 2010

Determining Vehicle Speeds From Skid Marks II

Filed under: News — Tags: — Your Bumper Guardian @ 2:00 am

By James O. Harris

Measuring skid marks:

The skid speed is the speed of the vehicle at the beginning of the visible skid mark. This will be a  conservative value as the wheels do not lock-up instantly. There is some “shadow skid,” a light mark produced as the wheels begin to slow and just before they achieve full lock. Shadow skid and clearly visible skid should be considered as one continuous mark for any given tire. Cars have four tires, two in the front followed directly by the two in the rear. The wheels on most cars, assuming the brake system is functioning correctly, will tend to lock at nearly the same time. Current brake design  includes pressure limiters that prevent the rear wheels from locking before the front wheels lock.

If all four wheels lock at the same time, and the vehicle is skidding in a straight line, the marks from the rear wheels will overlap the marks from the front wheels. Rear wheel skid marks can be identified by the dark center while skid marks from the front wheels can be identified by two distinct thin lines on the outer edges.
If four distinct skid marks can be found, they should be measured individually. To get the average skid distance for the vehicle, add the four measurements together and divide by four. This is the “average skid distance.” If three skid marks are found, add the three together and divide by three to get the average skid distance. The same applies to two marks. If only one mark is found, measure the entire length and use this as the skid distance.
If two skid marks are found, but it cannot be determined where the front wheel skid marks begin due to being overridden by the rear wheel skid marks, measure the entire length of the two skid marks, subtract one-half the wheelbase of the vehicle from the total and divide by two. The result is the average skid distance.

Share

January 28, 2010

Determining Vehicle Speeds From Skid Marks I

Filed under: News — Tags: — Your Bumper Guardian @ 8:51 am

By James O. Harris

This work is very basic, it does not address many of the factors involved in determining vehicle speeds from skids that are addressed by a professional traffic accident reconstructionist in calculating vehicle speeds. It is intended to give the reader an understanding of how vehicle speeds are determined from skid marks and some of the limitations of the calculations. This work is limited to determining speeds from cars. Trucks, cars pulling trailers, and motorcycles have a number of factors involved that are not addressed and this material should not be applied to situations involving those types of vehicles.

For ready reference, a table of average skid distances at various speed on various surfaces, is provided at the end of this article.
First, let’s define a skid mark. A skid mark is a tire mark on the road surface produced by a tire that is locked, that is not rotating. A skid mark typically appears very light at the beginning of the skid getting darker as the skid progresses and comes to an abrupt end if the vehicle stops at the end of the skid. There are other types of tire marks including scuffs, scrubs and yaw marks. These must not be confused with skidmarks. A skid mark is left when the driver applies the brakes hard, locking the wheels, but the car continues to slide along the road. Steering is not possible with the front wheels locked. Skid marks are generally straight but may have some curvature due to the slope of the road.

A car skids 60 feet. How fast was it going? The answer is, “It depends.” Several things must be determined before you can determine the vehicle’s skid speed. You must know the skid distance, a drag factor for the road surface and the braking efficiency of the vehicle.

Share

January 27, 2010

Crash Data Recorders

Filed under: News — Tags: — Your Bumper Guardian @ 9:46 am

In some ways similar to data recorders used on airplanes and trains, the car’s recorder springs into action as part of the air bag system.

Originally designed to improve air bag performance based on the severity of the collision, the event data recorder can tell traffic accident investigators about the car’s speed, engine RPMs, how far the accelerator pedal was pressed, if the brakes were applied, whether the driver’s seatbelt was buckled and what warning lights were on.

When an an air bag deployment collision accident occurs, the data is recorded onto a  computer chip. The data can be retrieved and is presented in a report.

The data download from the EDR will usually contain 6 to 8 pages of information. A second impact can be recorded in the secondary, or non-deployment, file depending upon the circumstances of the collisions and the time interval between them.

An air bag deployment is not required for information to be recorded. There are circumstances where an air bag deployment command would be issued but the algorithm used to order the deployment determines a deployment is not warranted, such as a driver out of position before deployment is ordered. This is a “deployment level” event. Data may be recorded for “non-deployment” events. This can include rollover, sideswipe and side impact accidents.

It is also possible no data can be recovered from a data recorder. One situation where this might occur would be a catastrophic loss of electrical power during the collision. In this situation, the entire power reserve in the air bag control module capacitor is used to deploy the air bags; there is none left for the recorder and no data is stored even though the air bags deployed.

Due to the variety of circumstances in any accident and variations in the type and amount of data any device is capable of recording, there are no guarantees of what data may be recorded, or may be recoverable, in any specific case.

Share

January 26, 2010

Low Speed Rear-Impact Collisions Physical Laws Related to Injuries Incurred VIII

Filed under: Research — Tags: — Your Bumper Guardian @ 8:44 am

By Dr. Gary Farr

Conclusion

An understanding of the basic physics and engineering principles of conservation of momentum, elastic and inelastic collisions, effect of vehicle crush distance, coefficient of restitution, magnification of acceleration, braking effect on acceleration, and effect of G force is a prerequisite to engaging in a meaningful discourse on the relationship of bodily injury and low-speed rear-impact collisions. Applying these principles demonstrates clearly why it is possible to see injuries following low-speed rear-impact collisions.

Engineering studies and/or accident reconstruction data can imply potential injury. However, whether an occupant of a specific low-speed rear-end impact collision actually sustains injury can only be determined after a thorough clinical evaluation. Utilizing traditional orthopedic, neurologic, and spinal examination procedures, in addition to any applicable radiography and computerized diagnostics, the examining doctor trained in the specialty of spinal/body mechanics is able to objectively determine if injury has actually occurred.

In addition, the inverse relationship between vehicular damage and occupant injury imposes a challenging dilemma for manufacturers of vehicles and government regulatory agencies. Decreasing the costs of body shop expenses for an accident damaged vehicle, while at the same time increasing the probability that the occupants of the vehicle will suffer some injury, is neither cost-effective nor sound public policy.

Share

January 22, 2010

Low Speed Rear-Impact Collisions Physical Laws Related to Injuries Incurred VII

Filed under: Research — Tags: — Your Bumper Guardian @ 2:57 pm

By Dr. Gary Farr

Effect of G Force

“G force” is defined as the acceleration imposed by earth’s gravity, or 32.2 feet per second, squared. A force of 5G, for example, means that a body is accelerating at five times the force of gravity. One researcher, I. Macnab, has described the effect of acceleration to injuries of the neck:

“If, as a result of an accident, the head accelerates in relationship to the trunk -backward, forward, or sideways -injury to the neck may result. Because lesions produced in this way differ from those resulting from forced passive movements of the head, it seems worthwhile to differentiate them by the term acceleration injuries of the neck. In acceleration injuries, the force applied to the neck is roughly equivalent to the weight of the head multiplied by the speed that the head is moving”.

The human head has an average weight of 10 pounds. Consequently, a 5G force results in a potential loading of approximately 50 pounds to the head.

West, Gough, and Harper found that at 11.6 km/h (7.25 mph), vehicle peak acceleration was 3. 1 G, while the occupant’s head accelerated in the X direction at a force of 8.3G. This is equivalent to an 83-pound force acting on the head. Extension or X direction acceleration of the cervical spine will result in multiple-plane loading components, creating a shearing force, tensile force, and a compressive or axial force.

Working on cadavers, Przybylski et al. performed ligament uniaxial tension testing on C2-C7. They found that the anterior longitudinal ligament had a mean ultimate load of 107 ± 63 Newtons. Furthermore, according to the Society of Automotive Engineers, the limit on shearing force in the cervical spine is 231 Newtons, or approximately 52 pounds, and the limit on axial force for the upper cervical spine is 249 Newtons, or approximately 56 pounds. One Newton is equal to 0.225 pounds of force.

Watts, Atkinson, and Hennessy performed theoretical mathematical calculations, assuming a delta V of the torso at I I mph. Their calculations revealed that a 60-degree extension would occur in 0.086 seconds, which is not enough time for muscles to be enervated and thereby act as a protective mechanism for the head and neck. Based on prior studies that had detected rupture of the neck ligaments at 178 pounds and cervical disc maximum loading of 230 pounds, their calculations revealed possible disc and/or ligament damage for a delta V of I I mph. Their calculations also demonstrated that cervical injury could be incurred, reaching loadings of 190 pounds of torque, at speeds as low as 7.5 mph in an untensed neck of a normal, healthy individual.

Similarly, Barzelay and Lacy observed that the risk of injury appears to be greatest in collisions with impact velocities between eight and 20 mph. They also concluded that the force to the head can reach 100 pounds in collisions where speed at impact is no more than 15 mph.

Watts and his colleagues observed that tolerance levels may be even more restricted in individuals with prior health problems:

“Consider a person with a prior neck problem such that his or her natural neck extension is limited to only 20 degrees and damage level is only 70 lbs, due to scar tissue. With only a small initial tensing of the neck muscles, this damage level will be reached at a push speed of 2.5-3.0 mph! Note that the lower push speed range is similar to or even lower than the speeds typical for causing vehicle damage. Thus, human body damage can occur with either 0 or very small amounts of vehicle damage and it is not necessary to have copious vehicle damage in order to hurt the human body”.

The injuries sustained in accidents can have long-term sequelae. Hohl, a physician researcher, studied 146 patients, with no pre-existing cervical degenerative changes, who had sustained soft-tissue injuries resulting from automobile accidents. He concluded, after a five-year study period, that 39 percent of the patients showed degenerative changes.

Share
Older Posts »

Powered by Asha Solutions